Documents will be unsealed in L.A. city attorney and DWP corruption case, judge rules

Documents will be unsealed in L.A. city attorney and DWP corruption case, judge rules
Los Angeles, CA – August 31: Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer, who is running for mayor in 2022, in response to a Los Angeles Times story on police overtime, holds a news conference in front of LAPD Headquarters on Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2021 in Los Angeles, CA. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)
(Irfan Khan/Los Angeles Times)

Documents will be unsealed in L.A. city attorney and DWP corruption case, judge rules

L.A. Politics ,Homepage News

Dakota Smith April 12, 2024

More than 1,000 pages of confidential documents from a federal criminal investigation into the Los Angeles

c

ity

a

ttorneys

o

ffice and the Department of Water and Power will be unsealed, a federal judge signaled

on

Friday.

The Times and Consumer Watchdog had requested the documents to better understand the government’s criminal case and whether former City Att

orne

y

.

Mike Feuer bore any culpability for a scandal involving a sham lawsuit and an extortion plot. Feuer has long denied wrongdoing.

In a tentative ruling, U.S. District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. said the documents, which consist mainly of dozens of search warrants filed during the government’s investigation, will be unsealed, with personal data redacted.

The names of public officials, along with individuals who are wrongdoers, will not be redacted, Blumenfeld said at a hearing Friday a blow to prosecutors who had sought to keep the officials’ names from the public.

The Times and Consumer Watchdog are expected to work with the U.S.

a

ttorney’s

o

ffice to ready the documents for release in the coming weeks.

Much of Friday’s hearing centered

around on

Feuer and whether an FBI agent’s alleged assertions that Feuer lied to a grand jury and lied to the FBI should be redacted.

The FBI agent’s purported comments, made in an affidavit for a search warrant, were revealed in court by a defendant, Paul Paradis, at his sentencing in November.

Paradis, a former attorney turned cooperating witness for the federal government, pleaded guilty to accepting a nearly $2.2 million kickback from another attorney working on the DWP case and was sentenced to 33 months in prison.

Paradis had ingratiated himself at City Hall, befriending top city officials. An outside lawyer from New York, he was retained by Feuer’s office to help with litigation related to the DWP, then went on to secure separate contracts at the DWP.

Later, he secretly recorded high-ranking city officials and was present when armed agents raided the home of DWP general manager David Wright, who is serving a six-year sentence after conspiring to give Paradis a lucrative contract.

Jerry Flanagan, an attorney for Consumer Watchdog and

T

he Times, told Blumenfeld that the FBI agents comments amounted to an opinion that wasnt subject to federal rules that require grand jury information to be kept confidential. Flanagan also argued that the “cat is out of the bag” because Paradis had publicly revealed the alleged comments.

Blumenfeld appeared concerned about protecting the secrecy of the grand jury process and said he would rule later on the issue.

Feuer has said he had no knowledge of any crimes. In a 2022 letter, the U.S.

a

ttorney’s

o

ffice told Feuer that he wasnt a target in their criminal investigation.

When asked by The Times last November about the FBI

‘s

agent

‘s

alleged statements, Feuer pointed to the 2022 letter.

Feuer also told

T

he Times last year that he gave the U.S.

a

ttorneys

o

ffice his phone in 2020, but investigators did not search his home or office.

A former state

a

ssemblymember and L.A. City Council member, Feuer ran for L.A. mayor in 2022 but dropped out shortly before the primary.

Last month,

he finished fourth in the

primary for the congressional seat

being vacated by Rep. Adam B. Schiff.

The 1,400 pages of search warrants and other documents requested by The Times and Consumer Watchdog were issued between 2019 and 2021.

Court filings by prosecutors in the criminal case make clear that some individuals, including city officials who remain anonymous in the filings, took part in or were aware of various schemes.

Only four people were ultimately charged, and prosecutors said that their case concluded last year.

The criminal prosecution centered

around on

a 2015 class-action lawsuit brought by DWP customers over massive errors caused by a new billing system at the utility.

The lawsuit was covertly written by Paradis, then working for Feuer’s office, who handed the suit to an outside attorney to file against the city.

The goal, according to prosecutors, was to settle all the claims by various DWP customers on terms advantageous to the city.

Prosecutors also uncovered other unethical and illegal schemes, including an illicit payment involving the city attorney’s office.

Blumenfeld said at Fridays hearing that he expected the name of one person, Julissa Salgueiro, to remain unredacted in the search warrants and other documents.

“Ms. Salgueiro is a quintessential wrongdoer,” Blumenfeld said, describing why her name should be unredacted.

Prosecutors have never named or charged Salgueiro,

but t

heir court filings refer to a former employee of a Beverly Hills law firm who threatened to reveal the citys collusive lawsuit over the DWP billing errors.

The employee had stolen or improperly retained documents showing the collusive lawsuit and demanded money for their return, prosecutors said in court documents.

Thom

as

Peters, a top aide to Feuer, was charged with aiding and abetting extortion after being ordered by unnamed city staff to take care of the employee’s threats, according to prosecutors. Prosecutors never charged any other senior staff members from the

c

ity

a

ttorney’s

o

ffice.

After pleading guilty, Peters was sentenced to nine months home detention and ordered to pay a $50,000 fine.

Salgueiro’s attorney, William Pitman, told

T

he Times on Friday that he “respectfully disagrees with Judge Blumenfelds opinion.” His client has never been charged, indicted and has no criminal history, he said.

“With regard to the unsealing motion, Ms. Salguiero was never notified [of the case],” said Pitman.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *