‘Game of Thrones’ actor sues LAPD and L.A. County over false pedophile case

‘Game of Thrones’ actor sues LAPD and L.A. County over false pedophile case
Joseph Gatt, left, from the worldwide blockbuster Star Trek Into Darkness gathers with guest to celebrate the films home entertainment debut on Tuesday, Sept, 10, 2013 at the California Science Center in Los Angeles. (Photo by Jordan Strauss /Invision for Paramount Pictures/AP Images)
(Jordan Strauss / Jordan Strauss/invision/ap)

‘Game of Thrones’ actor sues LAPD and L.A. County over false pedophile case

Matt Hamilton Nathan Solis James Queally April 5, 2024

Actor Joseph Gatt has appeared in numerous films and TV shows, including “Game of Thrones” and the live-action “Dumbo” movie from Disney. But in the early hours of April 6

,

2022, police officers and detectives swarmed his home and arrested him.

In the

days afterfollowing days

, his face was attached to a

Los Angeles Police Department

news release

as Los Angeles police

ask

inged

the public for help to find “any additional victims

,

announcing thatafter

Gatt was arrested

for allegedly on suspicion of

communicating with a minor in a sexually explicit manner.

But over the course of the next year

,

the case against him fell apart.

On Thursday, Gatt sued Los Angeles County, District Attorney Dist. Atty. George Gascn, the city of Los Angeles and the investigators who built the faulty case against him. Prosecutors hadIn February, the Los Angeles district attorney’s office

dropped all charges against the 52-year-old British actor

in February

.

On Thursday, Gatt sued Los Angeles County, District Attorney George Gascn, the city of Los Angeles and the investigators who built the faulty case against him.

When his case was dismissed, Gatt took to Instagram to say that he and his team were ready to present “overwhelming evidence” in court showing that the accuser manufactured evidence, that the search of his home was “illegal,” and that the case was marred by prosecutorial misconduct.

He wrote to

Gascn

, “I hope you read this.”

“It’s happening under your watch, right now,” Gatt said. “I voted for you and still believe you’re the best candidate, but this is exactly the kind of corruption you promised to clean up.”

Venusse Dunn, a spokeswoman for the district attorney’s office, said the case was dismissed due to “valid concerns regarding the sufficiency of the evidence.” She did not respond to additional questions about the investigation into Gatt. The case was dismissed “in the interest of justice” on Feb. 9, according to court records, the same day a preliminary hearing was scheduled

wherethat could have led to

Gatt

‘s could have aired his

allegations

being aired

in open court.

The Gatt’s law

suit alleges prosecutors and police failed to thoroughly investigate the claims made against

himGatt

,

including

failing to conduct a forensic analysis of the victim’s phone or even interview her until after the actor was arrested and faced public scrutiny over the charges. 

The lead prosecutor on the case, Angela Brunson, “resigned” from the D.A.’s office shortly before the case was dismissed, according to the lawsuit. Court records now show she works for the Riverside County

D

district a

A

ttorney’s office. She did not respond to

an email

request for comment.

A high-level source in

the district attorney’s Gascn’s

office, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case with the media, said the lawsuit has triggered an internal review of how the case was handled. The source said they “would not be surprised” if there was merit to Gatt’s allegations.

Prosecutors based their case on the allegations made by a girl in Kent, Wash

., ington

who

m

Gatt calls an obsessed fan. The girl’s older sister found fake Snapchat conversations on the girl’s phone about a year before Gatt’s arrest and took pictures of the conversations with her phone, according to Gatt’s 38-page federal lawsuit filed in the Central District of California.

The older sister uploaded the photos to a Google Drive and sent a link to the Kent

County

Police Department. The older sister also uploaded two images of men who did not have clothes on, but their genitalia and their faces were not shown, Gatt said.

The men in the pictures were not Gatt, according to his complaint, but the images were taken by a second phone, thus removing the ability to verify the data through the actual photos.

When police searched

his Gatt’s

Beverly Grove home, they took a purple blanket that could be seen in images

Gatt the actor had

shared on his social media accounts. One of the images taken from the Snapchat conversations on the girl’s phone showed a faceless man lying on top of a purple blanket, which looked similar to the one in Gatt’s home, but is not unique, according to the complain

t

.

The Snapchat conversations sent to police appeared to be snippets of the same conversations but with different responses. One supposedly showed Gatt writing that he and his partner had an arrangement that allowed him to pursue other relationships. Other screenshots show the same questions but with different responses, as though someone were trying out different answers with a software program.

“That conversation never happened; Jane Doe created it out of thin air,” Gatt said.

When Kent police tried to contact the 16-year-old girl, her older sister replied via email that “no further assistance is needed.”

Police noted in the case that they “did not find probable cause of a crime regarding the messages, according to the lawsuit.

A month later, the girl agreed to an interview with investigators with her brother-in-law present. She admitted to police that she had a crush on Gatt and claimed that Gatt had engaged in sexually explicit conversations

which that

turned out to be false, Gatt said.

Calls and e-mails to the Kent

P

olice

D

epartment

and LAPD seeking comment

were not immediately returned

Friday

The LAPD declined to comment due to the pending lawsuit.

Kent

County

police referred the case to

LAPD police in Los Angeles

, where it was eventually presented to the district attorney’s office and Brunson took over. Gatt claims that

she the prosecutor

has a “bias and personal animosity” against him, but he

does did

not elaborate on the nature of the bias in his lawsuit.

As a result of his arrest, Gatt’s agent and the public relations firm that represented him dropped him as a client. He lost acting roles

,

and scenes he

had

already filmed for two other movie projects were cut or reshot with different actors, according to Gatt.

He stopped receiving any new offers for work, was forced to sell his car and received death threats, according to the lawsuit.

His lawsuit goes beyond blaming law enforcement for casting him as

a

“serial pedophile without any evidence or probable cause,”

but and

accus

esing

police and prosecutors of breaches of fundamental practices and a disregard for due diligence.

“These charges originate entirely from the unverified story of Jane Doe, a then 16-year-old whom Gatt did not know and has never actually met, and whom [investigators] did not even bother to interview or even remotely assess for credibility until almost one year after arresting Gatt and prosecuting him,”

Gatt the suit

said.

He seeks Gatt is seeking

more than $40 million in damages.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *