How the U.N. Gaza resolution could lead to a lasting cease-fire

How the U.N. Gaza resolution could lead to a lasting cease-fire
RAFAH, GAZA – DECEMBER 01: Smoke rises from buildings due to Israeli airstrikes after the humanitarian pause ended on December 01, 2023 in Rafah, Gaza. (Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty Images)
(Anadolu / Anadolu via Getty Images)

How the U.N. Gaza resolution could lead to a lasting cease-fire

Op-Ed,Israel-Hamas

Daoud Kuttab March 27, 2024

After 171 days of a relentless Israeli assault on Gaza, the United Nations Security Council approved a resolution calling for a cease-fire in Gaza, with the United States abstaining. Its a breakthrough that must be built upon.

The resolution calls for an immediate cease-fire that should lead to a lasting sustainable cease-fire. But it weakens these adjectives by

limitingsaying that

the cease-fire

tois for

the remainder of the holy month of Ramadan, just two more weeks at most. Although U.N. officials consider their resolutions to be international law and thus binding, there is no direct means of enforcing these measures. Nonetheless, the resolution can be a key building block for serious negotiations.

Hamas, although not a state and therefore not under the power of the U.N., quickly welcomed the decision. Israel, on the other hand, rejected the Security Councils decision and canceled a trip to Washington by officials to work out military plans to avoid further civilian casualties in Gaza.

Still, Hamas reaction is a hopeful sign. Earlier negotiations in Doha, Qatars capital, included a U.S.-sponsored offer for a six-week humanitarian cease-fire and hostage release

and exchange for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

The U.S. deal which Israel had accepted was rejected by Hamas primarily because it lacked any reference to a permanent cease-fire. The lasting sustainable language of the U.N. resolution seems to have provided a tactical solution. Hamas has also said it wont release

any

more hostages until Israel agrees to a permanent cease-fire.

The hope then is that the U.N. demand for a cease-fire can be bolstered into longer-term solutions. In fact, following the adoption of the Security Council resolution, the Palestinian representative at the U.N., Riyad Mansour, said that his mission would now start working on a follow-up resolution to ensure

that

Rafah, the southern Gazan city where 1.4 million displaced Palestinians have fled, is not invaded and to prevent a further humanitarian crisis.

All efforts should be focused on the negotiations going on in Doha, with a clear goal of stopping the ground offensive of Rafah, and getting the U.S.-backed

limited cease-fire

agreement ratified by both sides immediately, so that both Israel and Hamas can start exchanging individuals held against their will. This could be part of a domino effect that will lead to a permanent cease-fire.

The Israeli reaction is regrettable although understandable because of the extremist views its government and leadership have been advocating. It appears that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus strategy is to prolong the war as long as possible, hoping for some semblance of victory. Yet even his American allies,

who continue to support Israel’s right to defend itself support Israel’s military goals, have

pushed back against

Netanyahu’s plans for further military action in Gaza.have told him that his grandiose goal is unattainable.

Palestinian nationalism and Palestinian resistance to the Israeli occupation will not be defeated by military might. Palestinians will not surrender or leave their land.

Mondays U.N. cease-fire resolution might lack teeth, but there is nothing barring members of the Security Council from submitting a follow-up resolution demanding that any side failing to comply with this resolution would become subject to sanctions as outlined in Chapter VII of the U.N. charter.

It is not clear whether Washington or any other permanent member of the Security Council would allow such a follow-up resolution to be adopted. But Israels defiance in the face of the worlds demand for a negotiated solution and an end to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza

war

could make it vulnerable to such sanctions.

Israels action or inaction now will be closely watched and there will be consequences if it continues in its refusal to cease its fire against the Palestinians of Gaza.

Daoud Kuttab is a Palestinian journalist, a former professor of journalism at Princeton University and a columnist with Al-Monitor. X: @daoudkuttab Threads: @Daoud.Kuttab

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *